0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹ÆÇ °£È£±×·ìÆÄ¿ö µµ±¸ÀÇ Å¸´çµµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ °ËÁõ

Validity and Reliability of K-SKAGOAO for Korean Nursing Groups

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2014³â 20±Ç 3È£ p.372 ~ 383
KMID : 1004620140200030372
¼º¿µÈñ ( Sung Young-Hee ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»ó°£È£´ëÇпø

À̹̰æ ( Lee Mi-Kyoung ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ÀÓ»ó°£È£Çבּ¸¼Ò
Á¤Á¤Èñ ( Jeong Jeong-Hee ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»ó°£È£´ëÇпø
¹ÚÇöÅ ( Park Hyun-Tae ) - ºÎõ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
±è¼±¿ì ( Kim Seon-Woo ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø Åë°èÁö¿ø½Ç

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to determine the content validity of a semantic revision of items on a reliable and valid instrument, the Sieloff-King Assessment of Group Outcome Attainment (Power) within Organizations in Korea (K-SKAGOAO).

Methods: The target population for research was chief nurse officers (CNOs) of all hospital within Korea. A sample of 303 hospitals from across the Korea was selected through a stratified random sampling process. A total of 174 CNOs comprised the final sample. Psychometric evaluation of the KSKAGOAO included: (a) criterion-related validity (b) factor analysis and (c) internal consistency reliability using Cronbach¡¯s alpha coefficients.

Results: The Convergent validity and criterion-related validity were supported. Cronbach¡¯s alpha coefficient for the K-SKAGOAO was .95. Subscale alphas ranged from .60 to .86.

Conclusion: The K-SKAGOAO and related subscales show validity and internal reliability. A nursing group of any size can use the K-SKAGOAO to both assess the group¡¯s level of outcome attainment and develop strategies to further
improve that level.
KeyWords
°£È£, ÆÄ¿ö, Áú¹®Áö
Nursing, Power, Questionnaire, Validity, Reliability
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)